Posted by Mr. Marcus Cotton, VP Executive Recruiting, Credit Union Resources, Inc on 7/29/2015

It is not the most qualified who gets the job, it is the most prepared! Keep that in mind the next time you are exploring opportunities in the marketplace.  With that being said, it is important to prepare, gather and anticipatePrepare physically and mentally.  Take notes on the company and opportunity.  Gather as much information as you can on the industry, company, position and interviewer.  Anticipate what will happen once the interview starts and the types of questions that will be asked.

What do you think the most commonly asked question is on an interview?

            What are your short/long term goals?

            What are your strengths/weakness?

            Why do you have an interest in this position?

None of these are even close to the most commonly asked question on an interview.  I can tell you that this question is asked on EVERY interview.  I can assure you that there is not a single interview that takes place and this question is not asked.  What is the question….. what is this famous question?

DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?

That is it!  The most commonly asked question that will be asked EVERYTIME.  What does this mean?  This means, as a candidate, you need to have questions prepared; several of them.  There is no way you can know everything about a position or company.  Do your research and come up with questions to fill the holes that you find.

I once had a candidate interview with the CEO of a credit union in Dallas, TX (we will leave him nameless).  This CEO is a very thorough interviewer.  He interviewed this candidate for hours and loved him.  Things were going extremely well.  At the end of the interview, the CEO asked the candidate if he had any questions.  The candidate paused, thought for a second, and said NO.  I think all my questions have been answered.  They wrapped things up and the interview concluded.

The CEO gave me a call right after the interview to give me feedback on my candidate.  He told me that the candidate was outstanding and was the ideal fit for the role.  He went on to say that he had no interest in pursuing him any further!  I asked him why?  His exact words were, “Marcus, he did not have any questions. I have worked here for years and I still have questions.  How can this candidate come in here for two hours and not have any questions?”

Needless to say, not having well thought out questions prepared, cost this candidate a great opportunity.  Do not let this happen to you.

Remember, it is not the most qualified who gets the job, it is the most prepared.

Categories: Education & Training, Employment & Staffing, Human Resources
Posted by Mr. Idrees Rafiq, Jr., AVP IT Consulting, Credit Union Resources, Inc on 7/27/2015

On the heels of the FFIEC issuing their Cybersecurity Assessment General Observations, they issued their Cybersecurity Toolkit to assist financial institutions in defending against the sophisticated and dynamic cyber threats. Letme preface by saying that I am not sick. I was actually happy when it came out and excited when reading through it. Reason being is that working in the realm of cybersecurity in the credit union industry for ten years, this guidance echoes the messages those of us in the cybersecurity space have been saying for years by giving guidance. With the breaches being more rampant and cybersecurity being a hot topic of examiners, the toolkit serves to be timely and relevant.

As with most new cybersecurity news and guidance, my phone and e-mail tends to get a little more love than normal. This new toolkit is yielding no different results. So I figured this blog post would be ideal to share with the masses what I’ve been sharing with a few. Here are a few answers to questions that I’ve received as well as some observations:

1) Credit Unions’ Response: The vast majority of credit unions I’ve communicated with who have reviewed this toolkit are very intimidated. So if you read it and feel overwhelmed, you are not alone. Keep in mind that with any new guidance, the pain is usually on the front end.

2) Don’t freak out… Yet: Although the FFIEC is not a regulatory body that governs credit unions, the NCUA does reference their guidance to credit unions based on some FFIEC standards. We still haven’t seen how NCUA or your State examiners will be using this tool; however, what we can expect is for them to be more intrusive when it comes to cybersecurity.

3) Where is the framework coming from: The NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) framework is used by the FFIEC to build their framework. Having used this framework in the cybersecurity portion of our information security risk assessment fieldwork, I can say that it is proven and yields great results.

4) Encourages pro-activeness: There are five levels of cybersecurity maturity which have been set. Of these levels, the baseline includes regulations and compliance. Therefore, this encourages credit unions to mature from the most basic cybersecurity into a new maturity level of ‘evolving, intermediate, advanced, and innovative’.

5) Achieving Compliance: Although portions in the FFIEC cybersecurity maturity model addresses compliance, it does not fully achieve compliance with NCUA Regulation 748 Appendix A. Reason being is that the regulation states that a credit union must have a risk-based Information Security Policy & Program addressing physical, administrative, and technical security.  The tool only addresses the technical aspects of a credit union’s Information Security Policy & Program.

Being reactive is a vulnerability to not only credit unions and their members’ assets, but a vulnerability to the industry as whole due to the new landscape of cybercrime and cyber warfare. Per the White House, President Obama has identified cybersecurity as one of the most serious economic and national security challenges we face as a nation. It was also stated that we are not adequately prepared to counter. As a result, abiding by and being able to identify and adjust to, at a minimum, baseline standards is necessary.

Feel free to reach out to me should you come across any questions, concerns, or feel like commenting. As mentioned before, I’m not sick, this just happens to be a topic which I like to discuss.

Categories: Compliance, Technology Consulting & Compliance
Posted by Mr. Doug Foister, Director of Research, Cornerstone Credit Union League on 7/24/2015

If you’ve ever taken a course in anthropology, you probably learned about ethnography. This refers to the onsite investigation of a culture in order to understand what its members do and feel. Perhaps a pith-helmeted professor with pen and notebook in a remote village comes to mind. Today, various types of ethnographic research are found in the corporate world. Many companies - including financial institutions - use this methodology to better understand how their consumers live, work and play – and how their lives make them more or less receptive to various products and services.

Wells Fargo is one such company. It’s helpful to review the way they conducted an ethnographic study and, in addition, how their results may benefit credit unions. The problem that prompted the ethnography was that Wells Fargo sends out a lot of communications, both online and offline, to their members. This includes statements, among other things, marketing offers, and deposit notifications. The communications come from different units within the bank, which can mean a wide variation in design, tone, and content. To insure that its communications were user friendly, the bank, along with Forrester Research, took the following steps in their ethnographic project  :

  • Recruited 20 customers to collect all communications from Wells Fargo and select competitors over a one-month period.
  • Facilitated immediate feedback on communications by allowing the customers to call a toll-free number and leave their “in the moment” reactions to each piece of communication they received. The bank also sent each participant a large scrapbook to archive everything and stickers to indicate whether they thought the piece was good, neutral, or bad.
  • Brought in thirteen of the most engaged participants for 90-minute interviews to walk through all their communications and debrief their scrapbooks. The research team also conducted a competitive exercise in which participants picked a brand they felt had something to teach Wells Fargo.

And what did this research show? Forrester Research discovered that:

  1. Communications delivered the basics but didn’t build relationships. The bank fell short on being perceived as approachable and empathetic, which were two areas they believe set the tone and gave an image of their brand.
  1. Customers want the bank to know them. One participant brought a newsletter from AARP and commented, “AARP knows when I turn 50; why doesn’t my bank?” Another said, “Netflix can tell me what to watch; why can’t the bank tell me how to reach my financial goals?” This feedback compelled the bank to invest in delivering relevant communications and also highlighted the need to seek best practices from outside of the banking industry.
  1. Marketing messages are viewed with suspicion. Participants tended to be skeptical of communications that seemed like marketing. They disliked pieces they deemed as “trying to sell me something.”
  1. Bad news can be delivered tactfully. One participant received an insufficient funds notice that she perceived as very helpful. The letter informed her of the problem, told her in three easy steps how to rectify it, and even gave her helpful financial management suggestions such as signing up for overdraft protection. One of the most frequent examples that participants brought in from competitors were notices of bad news that they liked. Wells Fargo executives concluded that a message delivered with relevant advice, in the appropriate context, can be well received, even if it’s bad news.
  1. Customers still have an appetite for good communications. The bank worried that customers might say it was communicating too much. On the contrary, customers said they wanted to hear more from the bank – specifically, tips, suggestions, advice, and relevant recommendations. Communications written from a customer-advocacy point of view, as opposed to a bank or product-centric point of view receive favorable assessments. Customers want to feel that the bank communicates with them as people.
  1. Different customers want different messages. The research showed that novice users of Wells Fargo want the bank to play an advisory role and teach them how to develop financial intelligence before they get into trouble. Moderately savvy users don’t want to be sold products; they want to see the pros and cons of offerings so they can make up their own minds. Financially savvy customers want to know the bank cares that they are customers and want the bank to provide them an edge that competitors can’t.

Clearly, ethnography yields deep insights. It’s a methodology applicable to virtually any area of member interaction, including communications, Web site design, branch layout, product features, member segmentation, and call center scripting. 2 Credit unions should regard it as a viable option in their marketing research toolbox.

If you have any questions, or would like to know more about conducting marketing research at your own credit union, please contact dfoister@cornerstoneleague.coop

 

1 MIT Sloan Management Review.

2 Forrester Research.

Categories: Research
Page 1 of 106 (318 items)
Prev
[1]
2
3
4
5
6
7
104
105
106
Next
Subscribe to the Blog

Categories & Archives
Category Filter

Author Filter


 
 

 

Affiliates:

Connect: FacebookTwitter©  Credit Union Resources, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Contact Us
4455 LBJ Freeway
Suite 1100
Dallas, Texas 75244-5998
Phone: (469) 385-6400
Toll Free: (800) 442-5762
Online Form